Back to Briefing Papers
| Home
Central Wisconsin Basin Partnership
White Paper on issues related to Vegetation Management
The focus of the Central Wisconsin Basin
Partnership's ad-hoc vegetation management committee is to identify issues of concern related to terrestrial ecosystems. The term vegetation
management, as used in this context contains three basic idea and
these are:
I. Ecological Capability: The ability of an area to support certain
types of plants and animals, and human use of the area.
II. Biological Diversity:
Biological diversity or biodiversity means all life forms, the places
they live, and the processes that support them. Biologically diverse
ecosystems have many complex linkages among a wide variety of plants
and animals and their physical and chemical environments.
III. Sustainability:
The management of terrestrial ecosystems to meet the needs of people
today without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs.
There are several types of communities that
are in decline in Wisconsin for reasons such as development of homes,
businesses, farms, industry, and roads, lack of land management education
and ethics, and economics. These communities include woodlands, savannahs,
grasslands, and wetlands. Some of the major issues relevant to these
communities include, improved management of private lands that includes
education efforts and communication improvements; integration across
land ownership; lack of baseline inventory data or compilation of
existing facts and data; economics which include crops and recreation
potential; invasive species, endangered resources; fragmentation and
loss of community.
Woodlands
--a community where trees form closed stands or provide more than
50% canopy (Curtis). Management of private lands is an issue where
education that teaches stewardship ethics, ecological system types,
and provides resources for landowners, both technical and financial
is lacking. Improved communication exchange among stakeholders that
include surveys will help improve private land management as well.
The economic concerns for woodlands are high. Invasive species such
as the gypsy moth, buckthorn, and garlic mustard need to be addressed
in addition to endangered species like the Karner blue butterfly,
eastern massassauga rattlesnake, black locust, and timber wolf. Fragmentation
and loss of this community regarding both the types of species and
diversity of species is of concern.
Savannahs-a
community where trees are a component but where their density is so
low that it allows grasses and other herbaceous vegetation to become
the actual dominants of the community (Curtis). The need for inventory
for pre-settlement historic information versus current information
for both public and private lands is lacking and/or needs to be compiled
into one document. The economic concerns for savannahs are of medium
concern. Invasive species such as spotted knapweed, Kentucky bluegrass,
and leafy spurge need to be addressed along with endangered species
such as the Karner Blue butterfly, eastern massassauga rattlesnake,
Kirtland’s warbler, regal frittilary, and woolly milkweed. Fragmentation
and loss of this community is an important concern.
Grasslands
-- an open area covered by low-growing plants, dominated by grass
like species of which at least one-half are true grasses, and with
less than one mature tree per acre (Curtis).The need for pre-settlement
historic information versus current information for both public and
private lands is again, lacking. Economics for grasslands include
the dairy industry and recreational activities such as birding with
a medium level of concern. Invasive species such as smooth brome,
Kentucky bluegrass, and spotted knapweed are of significance. The
endangered species of prime concern include prairie chickens, Henslows
sparrow, and the upland sandpiper. Again, both fragmentation and loss
of grasslands need to be addressed.
Wetlands --
a community where water is at, near, or above the land surface long
enough to be capable of supporting aquatic or hydrophytic vegetation
and which has soils indicative of wet conditions (Wisconsin Statutes
23.32(1)). Economics for wetlands can be of high concern because of
issues such as flood management, cranberry industry, filtering functions,
and sometimes, wild rice production.Invasive species in wetlands include
purple loosestrife, Eurasian milfoil, reed canary grass, and narrow
leaved cattails (typha angustifolia).Specific endangered communities
or species include sedges, calcareous fens, and mussels. Wetland communities
suffer from fragmentation and loss.
Stakeholders involved in vegetation management
issues and concerns include the following: NRCS, Land Trusts, public
agencies/local governments/municipalities, industry such as forestry,
cranberry, real estate, and recreation based, non-profit environmental
organizations such as Sierra Club, Audubon, Trout Unlimited, Wisconsin
Wetland Association, Chambers of Commerce, educators, politicians,
university faculty and staff, utilities, and agriculture such as vegetables,
dairy, and cranberry.
What can be done?
At first glance, these issues are overwhelming and people may
feel that anything they do will not make a difference. But there are
projects that can help lay groundwork for more noticeable efforts
such as the following:
Inventory fact gathering for the basin/compilation
or a “Natural Resource Basin Inventory” to include historic and trend
data.
Invasive species “task force” or a “white paper”.
This could include gathering current information/activities/programs,
identifying specific species, prioritizing, and education initiatives.
Initiative to increase use of school forests.
Brochure specific to community type and management
methods produced by the Central Wisconsin Basin Partnership.
A demonstration site such as restoring native
grasses in the Buena Vista area.
Survey of interested stakeholders and current
projects.
Back to Briefing
Papers | Home |