Back to Minutes Index |
Home
Meeting convened at 8:45 a.m.
Meeting Facilitator: John DuPlissis
Partners Present: Jason Folstad, Tom Jerow, Sally Freckman, Terry
Charles, George Bartels, Arvid Haugen, Dan Trainer, Dean Kaatz, George
Rogers, Rebecca Power, John DuPlissis, Jack Zimmerman, Kerrie Wheeler,
Kim Grveles and Ron Dickerl.
I. Welcome/Agenda Review – The group met at the Wausau School Forest
on County Road KK.
II. Working Group Reports
The Yellow River working group has not been active for the past month
as it awaits a resolution of taxation and property rights issues that
have risen. The public in and around the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service's
focus area along the Yellow River has become quite apprehensive about
Necedah National Wildlife Refuge's plan of work. The members of the
local community have formed a Yellow River Property Owners Association
focused on taxation issues and private property owner's rights. The
U.S. Fish and Wildlife service is planning meetings to work with this
group to resolve this issue, clarify their plan and remove any misconceptions,
and help create a working relationship to conserve the natural resources
in the Yellow River ecosystem.
The Plover River working group is working to receive approval of their
Stewardship grant application to purchase conservation easements along
the Plover River corridor to help protect the land from development.
The overall objective of the project is to maintain the integrity
of the Plover River at its current state. The working group is opposed
to having the Highway 10-bypass cross the Plover River. They mentioned
that several state organizations have already sent letters of concern
about the Highway 10-bypass crossing the Plover River. George Rogers
mentioned that he would like the Partnership to also show some local
support opposing the Highway 10- bypass by sending a letter of concern
to the DOT.
III. Creation of a Two Co-chair advisory committee.
The idea of creating an advisory committee that would help out the
partnership by filling a leadership role has been talked about in
the past but action was never taken. With the Highway 10-bypass letter
the partnership wants to write, the issue of who would sign the letter
came up. After a detailed discussion and some compromise a Two-Co
Chair panel was created. The main duties of the Two Co-chairs would
be to give their approval on the agendas, act as signatories on letters
for the behalf of the partnership and lead the partnership meetings.
One of the Co-chairs is going to be a DNR team leader and the other
co-chair position will be filled voluntarily. A coin was tossed between
Tom Jerow and Arvid Haugen determining who would be the Co-chair and
Tom Jerow was chosen. A consensus was made that the DNR leaders would
only be one of the Co-chairs for one year, then the other leader would
take on the Co-chair position. Only one person volunteered for the
other Co-chair, George Bartels, and the attending members of the partnership
had no rejections to Mr. Bartels becoming the other Co-chair. The
partnership agreed that George Bartels and Tom Jerow would work together
to bring back to the partnership a model for an executive committee
for action at our next meeting. Tom & George will look at other
partnerships for models of executive committees and bylaws.
It was decided that the partnership would send out the letter of concern
for the Highway 10-bypass crossing the Plover River will on Partnership
letterhead created by John DuPlissis and Jason Folstad. Just for the
record the DNR was not involved in the decision-making process and
acknowledges no support for the letter being sent for the Highway
10-bypass crossing the Plover River.
IV. Proposed New Projects.
Help to improve the overall water quality on Mill Creek
· Currently data is being collected on Mill Creek to determine the
TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) the creek is able to tolerate
· Current studies are determining who is adding the majority of the
nutrients and organic materials to the creek
· The three main sources for the organic materials and nutrients being
placed in Mill Creek are: Urban Runoff, Farmers within the watershed
and Point sources located along Mill Creek corridor.
· Actively involved parties to this date are Golden Sands RC&D,
DNR, Mill Creek Coalition and the Land Conservation Department.
· The role the Partnership could play is through education and getting
increased public participation and awareness.
Reduce the break up of large parcels of land in Adams County.
· Large tracts of land in Adams County that are currently owned by
Georgia Pacific are being broken up and sold.
· Most of the land for sale is marginal timberland i.e. wetlands,
along flowages, and stream and lake corridors).
· The county is unable to obtain grants for purchase of this land.
· With very little recreational land in Adams County, loosing Georgia
Pacific’s land, which was open to public recreational activities,
would pose quite a dilemma.
· The partnership could work with the Paper Mills and WPS to determine
what land usage would best suit them. We could also try to get easements
on the property before it is sold. The Conservation Fund, which is
able to work quickly on getting funds in place to obtain valuable
land that is ready to be developed or broken apart into smaller parcels,
could also be contacted.
Preventing and reducing the spread of exotics in Wisconsin.
· Golden Sands RC&D conducted a survey on what types of exotics
people have energy to work with.
· Actively involved parties to this date are Golden Sands RC&D,
DNR, Wild Ones and the State Botanical Society.
· This type of program could be done on a countywide or basin wide
status.
· The partnerships role in this project would be quite large, some
of the actives that would be involved are:
· Creating demo plots showing the methods used to remove exotics,
costs associated with the removal and the long term effects of the
removal.
· Start educational training sessions on when to mow, treat and plant
other species to help reduce the different types of exotic in your
area.
· Determine if removal of exotics in an area effect the overall diversity
of the landscape.
· Find out if there are any funds that would be able to be tapped
into for reducing exotics in our basin.
Maintaining the water quality and quantity of the Little Plover River.
· The Village of Plover has several conflicts pertaining to the water
usage of the Little Plover Watershed.
· Some of the stakeholders in the Little Plover Watershed are Village
of Plover, several industries, the state, agriculture, and surrounding
landowners.
· Actively involved parities to this date are the Village of Plover,
DNR, Plover River Alliance, River Alliance and UWSP.
· Possible partnership activities would be developing a working group
to stay on top of the different ongoing projects on the Little Plover
River to make sure they are reaching their goals. Also to work with
all the parties involved creating a better understanding of what each
group requires and needs from the Little Plover River Watershed. Then
try to develop a plan that would allow each group an equal but limited
use of the watershed.
I. Our Guest Speaker was Sally Ellingboe
Sally Ellingboe is the Public School Environmental Education Coordinator
for the Stevens Point School District. Her topic of discussion was
making school forests a better tool for educating our youth in the
school districts. Sally mentioned some of the concerns and problems
that school forests face today. For example, with land gaining value
and schools receiving smaller budgets, the sale of school forestland
for additional school funding is becoming a reality. She talked about
how making a school forest successful takes a developed curriculum
and standards that show how a forest will benefit not only the children
but also the community. The Wisconsin School Forest Educational Alliance
has sent out a program booklet on "How to Grow a School Forest" to
every school district in Wisconsin to help them better utilize their
school forest. Sally stated that our largest fear is with school budgets
starting to decline, school forests may be one of the first things
to vanish.
II. Van Der Geest Dairy
We took a tour of Wisconsin’s largest dairy farm located just a few
miles north of Wausau on County Road A. We were able to see how they
were able to milk a little over 3,000 head, three times a day. They
showed us how the milk is never exposed to the air, is able to be
cooled from 102 to 34 degrees, and is on the semi tanker within three
and a half minutes. We learned they produce 187,000 pounds of milk
(three and half semi loads) a day which is used to make cheese and
butter. We viewed their manure storage facility a 12 acres pond in
size capable of holding over 46 million gallons. We also learned about
their storm water runoff retention pond capable of holding over 4
million gallons of water in one rain event. The Van Der Geest Dairy
is a family run operation with every family member playing a role
in running the dairy farm. Guided tours are available Monday – Saturday
from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. year around.